4.6 Article

Structural and thermodynamic study of Ca A- or Co B-site substituted SrFeO3-δ perovskites for low temperature chemical looping applications

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 22, 期 17, 页码 9272-9282

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp01049a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss Federal Office of Energy (BFE) [SI/501590-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perovskite-structured materials, owing to their chemical-physical properties and tuneable composition, have extended their range of applications to chemical looping processes, in which lattice oxygen provides the oxygen needed for chemical reactions omitting the use of co-fed gaseous oxidants. To optimise their oxygen donating behaviour to the specific application a fundamental understanding of the reduction/oxidation characteristics of perovskite structured oxides and their manipulation through the introduction of dopants is key. In this study, we investigate the structural and oxygen desorption/sorption properties of Sr1-xCaxFeO3-delta and SrFe1-xCoxO3-delta (0 <= x <= 1) to guide the design of more effective oxygen carriers for chemical looping applications at low temperatures (i.e. 400-600 degrees C). Ca A- or Co B-site substituted SrFeO3-delta show an increased reducibility, resulting in a higher oxygen capacity at T <= 600 degrees C when compared to the unsubstituted sample. The quantitative assessment of the thermodynamic properties (partial molar enthalpy and entropy of vacancy formation) confirms a reduced enthalpy of vacancy formation upon substitution in this temperature range (i.e. 400-600 degrees C). Among the examined samples, Sr0.8Ca0.2FeO3-delta exhibited the highest oxygen storage capacity (2.15 wt%) at 500 degrees C, complemented by excellent redox and structural stability over 100 cycles. The thermodynamic assessment, supported by in situ XRD measurements, revealed that the oxygen release occurs with a phase transition perovskite-brownmillerite below 770 degrees C, while the perovskite structure remains stable above 770 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据