4.7 Review

Electrochemical hydrogen compression and purification versus competing technologies: Part I. Pros and cons

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 756-769

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63404-2

关键词

Electrochemical hydrogen compression; Hydrogen energy; Electrochemical hydrogen purification; Thermdynamics; Efficiency

资金

  1. Auvergne Rhone-Alpes region [ANR-10-LABX-44-01]
  2. IDEX Universite Grenoble Alpes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is undisputed that hydrogen will play a great role in our future energetic mix, because it enables the storage of renewable electricity (power-to-Hz) and the reversible conversion into electricity in fuel cell, not to speak of its wide use in the (petro)chemical industry. Whereas in these applications, pure hydrogen is required, today's hydrogen production is still largely based on fossil fuels and can therefore not be considered pure. Therefore, purification of hydrogen is mandatory, at a large scale. In addition, hydrogen being the lightest gas, its volumetric energy content is well-below its competing fuels, unless it is compressed at high pressures (typically 70 MPa), making compression unavoidable as well. This contribution will detail the means available today for both purification and for compression of hydrogen. It will show that among the available technologies, the electrochemical hydrogen compressor (EHC), which also enables hydrogen purification, has numerous advantages compared to the classical technologies currently used at the industrial scale. EHC has their thermodynamic and operational advantages, but also their ease of use. However, the deployment of EHCs will be viable only if they reach sufficient performances, which implies some specifications that their base materials should stick to. The present contribution will detail these specifications. (C) 2020, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据