4.2 Review

Corticosteroids for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

出版社

MEDYCYNA PRAKTYCZNA SP K SP ZOO
DOI: 10.20452/pamw.15239

关键词

acute respiratory distress syndrome; corticosteroids; mortality; systematic review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

INTRODUCTION Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a rapidly progressing, inflammatory lung disease with a high mortality rate and no specific pharmacological treatment available. OBJECTIVES We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on corticosteroid use in ARDS. METHODS We searched 4 medical literature databases and retained randomized controlled trials on the use of corticosteroids in hospitalized adults with ARDS, which could be found there until February 2020. Two reviewers identified eligible studies, independently extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias. The authors assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS We included 7 randomized controlled trials involving 851 patients. They showed that corticosteroids reduced all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.95; P = 0.02; moderate certainty) and the duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference [MD], -4.93 days; 95% CI; -7.81 to -2.06; P<0.001; low certainty), and increased the number of ventilator-free days (MD, 4.28 days; 95% CI, 2.67-5.88; P<0.001; moderate certainty), as compared with placebo. Corticosteroids also increased the risk of hyperglycemia (RR, 1.12%; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24; P = 0.03; moderate certainty), and the effect on neuromuscular weakness was unclear (RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8-2.11; P = 0.28; low certainty). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that systemic corticosteroids may potentially improve mortality, shorten ventilation times, and increase the number of ventilator-free days in patients with ARDS. However, the studies included different corticosteroid classes and initiated drug administration at different times, as well as used various dosing regimens. Thus, caution in the actual clinical application of these results is recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据