4.2 Article

Pulmonary metastasis from giant cell tumor of bone: clinical outcome prior to the introduction of molecular target therapy

期刊

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 47, 期 6, 页码 529-534

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyx033

关键词

giant cell tumor of bone; pulmonary metastasis; local recurrence; metastasectomy; follow-up period

类别

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H02676] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We analyzed the risk factors for pulmonary metastasis from giant cell tumor of bone and aimed to discuss their therapeutic strategy and appropriate follow-up period. Methods: We analyzed 141 patients of giant cell tumor of bone. The variables analyzed included age, gender, primary site, Campanacci grading, surgical treatment on the primary lesion, radiotherapy and local recurrence. Results: Pulmonary metastasis occurred in 12 patients. The risk factors were young age, Campanacci Grade Ill and local recurrence. Median time from initial surgery to metastasis was 1.3 years (0-3.1 years). Among them, eight patients experienced local recurrence of the primary tumor, and the median time from initial surgery to local recurrence was 0.8 years (0.3-2.9 years). Among seven patients who underwent wide resection, three patients showed local recurrence of the soft tissue. Nine patients underwent metastasectomy for pulmonary metastases. Of three patients who did not undergo metastasectomy, one patient died of uncontrollable metastases, and two patients showed no changes in their metastatic lesions. Conclusions: Although we found a correlation between local recurrence and pulmonary metastasis, we were still unable to prevent local or metastatic recurrence by wide resection. Local recurrence and metastasis have been found within 3 years after initial surgery, and routine image examinations of the primary site and chest after initial surgical treatment should be considered for at least 3 years postoperatively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据