4.6 Article

Characterization of Resistance in Gram-Negative Urinary Isolates Using Existing and Novel Indicators of Clinical Relevance: A 10-Year Data Analysis

期刊

LIFE-BASEL
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life10020016

关键词

clinical microbiology; indicators; urinary tract infection; Gram-negative; drug resistance; usual drug resistance; difficult-to-treat resistance; UDR; DTR; MDR; XDR; PDR

资金

  1. ESCMID Mentorship and Observership Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Classical resistance classifications (multidrug resistance [MDR], extensive drug resistance [XDR], pan-drug resistance [PDR]) are very useful for epidemiological purposes, however, they may not correlate well with clinical outcomes, therefore, several novel classification criteria (e.g., usual drug resistance [UDR], difficult-to-treat resistance [DTR]) were introduced for Gram-negative bacteria in recent years. Microbiological and resistance data was collected for urinary tract infections (UTIs) retrospectively, corresponding to the 2008.01.01-2017.12.31. period. Isolates were classified into various resistance categories (wild type/susceptible, UDR, MDR, XDR, DTR and PDR), in addition, two new indicators (modified DTR; mDTR and mcDTR) and a predictive composite score (pMAR) were introduced. Results: n = 16,240 (76.8%) outpatient and n = 13,386 (69.3%) inpatient UTI isolates were relevant to our analysis. Citrobacter-Enterobacter-Serratia had the highest level of UDR isolates (88.9%), the Proteus-Providencia-Morganella group had the highest mDTR levels. MDR levels were highest in Acinetobacter spp. (9.7%) and Proteus-Providencia-Morganella (9.1%). XDR- and DTR-levels were higher in non-fermenters (XDR: 1.7%-4.7%. DTR: 7.3%-7.9%) than in Enterobacterales isolates (XDR: 0%-0.1%. DTR: 0.02%-1.5%). Conclusions: The introduction of DTR (and its' modifications detailed in this study) to the bedside and in clinical practice will definitely lead to substantial benefits in the assessment of the significance of bacterial resistance in human therapeutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据