4.7 Article

Natural resource endowment, institutional quality and China's regional economic growth

期刊

RESOURCES POLICY
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101644

关键词

Economic growth; Institution; Natural resource endowment; Resource curse

资金

  1. Financial and Economics Development Project of Jiangsu Social Science Application Excellent Project in 2018 of Jiangsu Association of Social Sciences Equity Incentive and Management Behavior: A Study Based on Jiangsu Listed Companies [18SCB-46]
  2. Higher Education Institution of Jiangsu Province in 2018 Research on The Executive Results of Equity Incentive from The Perspective of Management Power [2018SJA0135]
  3. Youth Science and Technology Innovation Foundation of Nanjing Forestry University in 2017 Research on Equity Incentive of Listed Companies from The Perspective of Executive Turnover [CX2017016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The provincial panel data from 2005 to 2018 in this paper classifies institutional variables into the degree of market resource allocation, market openness, and property rights diversification. It empirically analyzes the relationship between economic growth, natural resources, and institutions quality. The research results show that the resource curse proposition is valid at the provincial level in China. The low-quality market resource allocation system and property rights system curbed the potential advantages of natural resources to promote economic development and caused the resource curse effect. Similarly, the increase in market openness can ease the resource curse effect. Moreover, in the context of the spatial agglomeration of natural resources, there is a negative spatial correlation between economic growth, and the resource curse effect is more severe in areas where resources are more abundant. In addition, it is found that natural resource endowments will affect the quality of the system. Under the effect of the causal cycle mechanism, the lower the quality of the system, the more severe resource curse effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据