4.7 Article

Effect of Oral Capsule-vs Colonoscopy-Delivered Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection A Randomized Clinical Trial

期刊

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 318, 期 20, 页码 1985-1993

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.17077

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alberta Health Services
  2. University of Alberta Hospital Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IMPORTANCE Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)is effective in preventing recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (RCDI). However, it is not known whether clinical efficacy differs by route of delivery. OBJECTIVE To determine whether FMT by oral capsule is noninferior to colonoscopy delivery in efficacy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Noninferiority, unblinded, randomized trial conducted in 3 academic centers in Alberta, Canada. A total of 116 adult patients with RCDI were enrolled between October 2014 and September 2016, with follow-up to December 2016. The noninferiority margin was 15%. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomly assigned to FMT by capsule or by colonoscopy at a 1: 1 ratio. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomewas the proportion of patients without RCDI 12 weeks after FMT. Secondary outcomes included (1) serious and minor adverse events, (2) changes in quality of life by the 36-Item Short Form Survey on a scale of 0 (worst possible quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life), and (3) patient perception on a scale of 1 (not at all unpleasant) to 10 (extremely unpleasant) and satisfaction on a scale of 1 (best) to 10 (worst). RESULTS Among 116 patients randomized (mean [SD] age, 58 [19] years; 79 women [68%]), 105 (91%) completed the trial, with 57 patients randomized to the capsule group and 59 to the colonoscopy group. In per-protocol analysis, prevention of RCDI after a single treatment was achieved in 96.2% in both the capsule group (51/53) and the colonoscopy group (50/52) (difference, 0%; 1-sided 95% CI, -6.1% to infinity; P < .001), meeting the criterion for noninferiority. One patient in each group died of underlying cardiopulmonary illness unrelated to FMT. Rates of minor adverse events were 5.4% for the capsule group vs 12.5% for the colonoscopy group. There was no significant between-group difference in improvement in quality of life. A significantly greater proportion of participants receiving capsules rated their experience as not at all unpleasant (66% vs 44%; difference, 22% [95% CI, 3%-40%]; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among adults with RCDI, FMT via oral capsules was not inferior to delivery by colonoscopy for preventing recurrent infection over 12 weeks. Treatment with oral capsulesmay be an effective approach to treating RCDI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据