4.2 Review

Experimental and analytical analysis of a bladeless turbine of an incompressible fluid in a confined cylinder

期刊

RESULTS IN ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100130

关键词

Bladeless turbine; Efficiency; Incompressible fluid; Rotational speed; Air moisture regulator

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The growing demand for electricity in developing countries is a source of concern and therefore it is necessary to explore other methods of energy generation in which one of the methods is considered in this study. The power generation is through a bladeless turbine that operates on incompressible fluid and has a renewable energy source that is available throughout the year. The flow model (Laminar flow) is linearized for experimental design and construction of a prototype bladeless turbine with an incompressible air medium and inclusion of air moisture regulator (ATR). The introduced ATR device is connected to the air hose that linked up with the inlet nozzle to filter the airflow moisture and it has a strong influence and yielded better performance on the turbine output. The findings are presented graphically and discussed for the bladeless turbine performance to portray the impacts of the important embodiment parameters. The experimental bladeless turbine Reynold's number Re <= 528.53 and rotational speed <= 944.31 rad/s operating within the laminar range of efficiency 23.9% while model efficiency is 34%. The efficiency comparison of the analytical solutions model to the experimental (prototype) bladeless turbine revealed a notable divergence, but the correlation between calculated theoretical results and the experimental (prototype) results are significant. The comparison, correlations amid performance parameters with the introduced ATR device connected to the air hose that linked up with the inlet nozzle to filter the airflow moisture are examined in the experiments and the results are analyzed using Graphpad 5.0 computer software.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据