4.7 Article

Adsorption behavior of per- and polyfluoralkyl substances (PFASs) to 44 inorganic and organic sorbents and use of dyes as proxies for PFAS sorption

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.103744

关键词

PFAS; PFOS; Dye sorption; Stabilization; Proxy

资金

  1. project PFAS-PURE from VINNOVA [2015-03561]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Per- and polyfluoralkyl substances (PFASs) are a major concern in pollution of drinking water sources and aquatic environments. This study investigated the sorption behavior of 17 PFASs of varying chain lengths and functional groups to 44 conventional and novel inorganic and organic sorbents with potential in treatment of PFAS-contaminated water or soil. For the first time, a large number of sorbents were tested for a wide variety of PFASs in batch sorption experiments under controlled experimental set-up. Also, the sorption behavior of four different dyes (methylene blue, crystal violet, indigo carmine, rose bengal) was also determined, to assess whether dyes can be used as a proxy for PFAS sorption. Of the 44 sorbents tested, PFASs sorbed best (mean > 99.9 %) to activated carbons (granulated and pulverized (n = 5)). Sorption of PFASs to magnesium chloride-fortified biochar, Moringa seed, and pyrolytic carbon waste was 17- to 25-fold higher than to sand. Sorption generally increased with increasing perfluorocarbon chain length and based as follows on functional group: fluorotelomer sulfonic acids (FTSAs) < perfluoroalkyl carboxylates (PFCAs) < perfluoroalkane sulfonates (PFSAs) < perfluorooctanesulfonamide (FOSA). Principal component analysis revealed that electrostatic sorption dominated for shorter-chained PFASs and that hydrophobic sorption dominated for longer-chained PFASs. All four dyes tested proved suitable as proxies for sorption of PFASs. In particular, methylene blue correlated best to short-chain PFASs (e.g., perfluorohexanoate (PFHxA)) and rose bengal to longer homologues (i.e., per-fluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据