4.7 Article

Shadow and quasinormal modes of a rotating loop quantum black hole

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 101, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.084001

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11675145, 11975203]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY20A050002]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang in China [RF-A2019015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we construct an effective rotating loop quantum black hole (LQBH) solution, starting from the spherical symmetric LQBH by applying the Newman-Janis algorithm modified by Azreg-Ainou's noncomplexification procedure, and study the effects of loop quantum gravity (LQG) on its shadow. Given the rotating LQBH, we discuss its horizon, ergosurface, and regularity as r -> 0. Depending on the values of the specific angular momentum a and the polymeric function P arising from LQG, we find that the rotating solution we obtained can represent a regular black hole, a regular extreme black hole, or a regular spacetime without horizon (a non-black-hole solution). We also study the effects of LQG and rotation, and show that, in addition to the specific angular momentum, the polymeric function also causes deformations in the size and shape of the black hole shadow. Interestingly, for a given value of a and inclination angle theta(0), the apparent size of the shadow monotonically decreases, and the shadow gets more distorted with increasing P. We also consider the effects of P on the deviations from the circularity of the shadow, and find that the deviation from circularity increases with increasing P for fixed values of a and theta(0). Additionally, we explore the observational implications of P in comparing with the latest Event Horizon Telescope observation of the supermassive black hole, M87*. The connection between the shadow radius and quasinomial modes in the eikonal limit as well as the deflection of massive particles are also considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据