4.7 Article

Wandering Massive Black Holes or Analogs of the First Repeating Fast Radio Burst?

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 895, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9015

关键词

Radio transient sources; Dwarf galaxies; Active galactic nuclei; Extragalactic radio sources; Gamma-ray bursts; Magnetars; Supernova remnants

资金

  1. NSF [AST-1714498]
  2. NASA through the NASA Hubble Fellowship - Space Telescope Science Institute [HST-HF251412.001-A]
  3. NASA [NAS5-26555]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The discovery of a persistent radio source coincident with the first repeating fast radio burst, FRB 121102, and offset from the center of its dwarf host galaxy has been used as evidence for a link with young millisecond magnetars born in superluminous supernovae or long-duration gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs). A prediction of this scenario is that compact radio sources offset from the centers of dwarf galaxies may serve as signposts for at least some FRBs. Recently, Reines et al. presented the discovery of 20 such radio sources in nearby (z less than or similar to 0.055) dwarf galaxies, and argued that these cannot be explained by emission from H ii regions, normal supernova remnants, or normal radio supernovae. Instead, they attribute the emission to accreting wandering massive black holes. Here, we explore the alternative possibility that these sources are analogs of FRB 121102. We compare their properties-radio luminosities, spectral energy distributions, light curves, ratios of radio-to-optical flux, and spatial offsets-to FRB 121102, a few other well-localized FRBs, and potentially related systems, and find that these are all consistent as arising from the same population. We further compare their properties to the magnetar nebula model used to explain FRB 121102, as well as to theoretical off-axis LGRB light curves, and find overall consistency. Finally, we find a consistent occurrence rate relative to repeating FRBs and LGRBs. We outline key follow-up observations to further test these possible connections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据