4.8 Article

Ligand exchange on Au38(SR)24: substituent site effects of aromatic thiols

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 12, 期 17, 页码 9423-9429

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0nr01430c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF DMR-1808675]
  2. NSF [ACI-1548562]
  3. National Science Foundation (CBET-CAREER program) [1652694]
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1652694] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the critical roles of ligands (e.g. thiolates, SR) in the formation of metal nanoclusters of specific sizes has long been an intriguing task since the report of ligand exchange-induced transformation of Au-38(SR)(24) into Au-36(SR ')(24). Herein, we conduct a systematic study of ligand exchange on Au-38(SC2H4Ph)(24) with 21 incoming thiols and reveal that the size/structure preference is dependent on the substituent site. Specifically, ortho-substituted benzenethiols preserve the structure of Au-38(SR)(24), while para- or non-substituted benzenethiols cause its transformation into Au-36(SR)(24). Strong electron-donating or -withdrawing groups do not make a difference, but they will inhibit full ligand exchange. Moreover, the crystal structure of Au-38(SR)(24) (SR = 2,4-dimethylbenzenethiolate) exhibits distinctive pi MIDLINE HORIZONTAL ELLIPSIS pi stacking and anagostic interactions (indicated by substantially short AuMIDLINE HORIZONTAL ELLIPSISH distances). Theoretical calculations reveal the increased energies of frontier orbitals for aromatic ligand-protected Au-38, indicating decreased electronic stability. However, this adverse effect could be compensated for by the AuMIDLINE HORIZONTAL ELLIPSISH-C interactions, which improve the geometric stability when ortho-substituted benzenethiols are used. Overall, this work reveals the substituent site effects based on the Au-38 model, and highlights the long-neglected anagostic interactions on the surface of Au-SR NCs which improve the structural stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据