4.7 Review

Integrated Electrochemical Biosensors for Detection of Waterborne Pathogens in Low-Resource Settings

期刊

BIOSENSORS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bios10040036

关键词

electrochemical biosensors; low-resource settings; point-of-care; in-situ monitoring; microbial pollution; low and middle-income countries (LMICs)

资金

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) GW4 FRESH CDT
  2. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) GCRF project ReNEW [EP/P028403/1]
  3. EPSRC Doctoral Training Award
  4. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LQ1601]
  5. EPSRC [EP/P028403/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

More than 783 million people worldwide are currently without access to clean and safe water. Approximately 1 in 5 cases of mortality due to waterborne diseases involve children, and over 1.5 million cases of waterborne disease occur every year. In the developing world, this makes waterborne diseases the second highest cause of mortality. Such cases of waterborne disease are thought to be caused by poor sanitation, water infrastructure, public knowledge, and lack of suitable water monitoring systems. Conventional laboratory-based techniques are inadequate for effective on-site water quality monitoring purposes. This is due to their need for excessive equipment, operational complexity, lack of affordability, and long sample collection to data analysis times. In this review, we discuss the conventional techniques used in modern-day water quality testing. We discuss the future challenges of water quality testing in the developing world and how conventional techniques fall short of these challenges. Finally, we discuss the development of electrochemical biosensors and current research on the integration of these devices with microfluidic components to develop truly integrated, portable, simple to use and cost-effective devices for use by local environmental agencies, NGOs, and local communities in low-resource settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据