4.6 Editorial Material

Neointimal Modification With Scoring Balloon and Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Therapy in Patients With Restenosis in Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents A Randomized Controlled Trial

期刊

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
卷 10, 期 13, 页码 1332-1340

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.024

关键词

drug-coated balloon; drug-eluting stent(s); randomized trial; restenosis; scoring balloon

资金

  1. Abbott Vascular
  2. Biotronik
  3. Boston Scientific
  4. Orbus Neich
  5. BioSensors International
  6. CeloNova
  7. Medtronic
  8. Microport
  9. SinoMedical
  10. Terumo Corporation
  11. W.L. Gore
  12. St. Jude Medical
  13. B. Braun Melsungen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare neointimal modification with scoring balloon pre-dilation before drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus DCB standard therapy in patients presenting with drug-eluting stent (DES) restenosis. BACKGROUND DCB angioplasty for the treatment of coronary drug-eluting stent restenosis has demonstrated encouraging results. The efficacy of DCB treatment relies on rapid initial drug transfer and tissue retention of the anti-proliferative drug. Neointimal modification with scoring balloon pre-dilation may enhance the efficacy of DCB therapy. METHODS In this randomized, open-label, active-controlled trial, 252 patients with clinically significant DES restenosis were enrolled at 4 centers in Germany. Patients undergoing DCB angioplasty were randomly assigned to treatment with scoring balloon pre-dilation or standard therapy. The primary endpoint of the study was in-segment percentage diameter stenosis on 6-to 8-month follow-up angiography. The secondary endpoints included binary angiographic restenosis and late lumen loss on follow-up angiography, the combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and target lesion thrombosis at 1 year. RESULTS Follow-up angiographic data at 6 to 8 months were available for 203 patients (80.6%). Scoring balloon pre-dilation compared with standard therapy showed significantly lower rates with respect to the primary endpoint (35.0 +/- 16.8% vs. 40.4 +/- 21.4%; p = 0.047) and binary angiographic restenosis (18.5% vs. 32.0%; p = 0.026). Late lumen loss was numerically lower after scoring balloon pre-dilation compared with standard therapy (0.31 +/- 59 mm vs. 0.41 +/- 0.74 mm; p = 0.27). There was no difference between the groups in the incidence of death or myocardial infarction (4.0% vs. 3.4%; p = 0.73). Scoring balloon versus standard therapy showed comparable rates of target lesion revascularization (16.2% vs. 21.8%; p = 0.26). No target lesion thrombosis occurred out to 1 year. CONCLUSIONS In patients presenting with drug-eluting stent restenosis, neointimal modification with scoring balloon improves the antirestenotic efficacy of DCB therapy. (Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Optimizing Treatment of Drug Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis 4 [ISAR-DESIRE 4]; NCT01632371) (C) 2017 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据