期刊
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
卷 10, 期 13, 页码 1332-1340出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.024
关键词
drug-coated balloon; drug-eluting stent(s); randomized trial; restenosis; scoring balloon
资金
- Abbott Vascular
- Biotronik
- Boston Scientific
- Orbus Neich
- BioSensors International
- CeloNova
- Medtronic
- Microport
- SinoMedical
- Terumo Corporation
- W.L. Gore
- St. Jude Medical
- B. Braun Melsungen
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare neointimal modification with scoring balloon pre-dilation before drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus DCB standard therapy in patients presenting with drug-eluting stent (DES) restenosis. BACKGROUND DCB angioplasty for the treatment of coronary drug-eluting stent restenosis has demonstrated encouraging results. The efficacy of DCB treatment relies on rapid initial drug transfer and tissue retention of the anti-proliferative drug. Neointimal modification with scoring balloon pre-dilation may enhance the efficacy of DCB therapy. METHODS In this randomized, open-label, active-controlled trial, 252 patients with clinically significant DES restenosis were enrolled at 4 centers in Germany. Patients undergoing DCB angioplasty were randomly assigned to treatment with scoring balloon pre-dilation or standard therapy. The primary endpoint of the study was in-segment percentage diameter stenosis on 6-to 8-month follow-up angiography. The secondary endpoints included binary angiographic restenosis and late lumen loss on follow-up angiography, the combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and target lesion thrombosis at 1 year. RESULTS Follow-up angiographic data at 6 to 8 months were available for 203 patients (80.6%). Scoring balloon pre-dilation compared with standard therapy showed significantly lower rates with respect to the primary endpoint (35.0 +/- 16.8% vs. 40.4 +/- 21.4%; p = 0.047) and binary angiographic restenosis (18.5% vs. 32.0%; p = 0.026). Late lumen loss was numerically lower after scoring balloon pre-dilation compared with standard therapy (0.31 +/- 59 mm vs. 0.41 +/- 0.74 mm; p = 0.27). There was no difference between the groups in the incidence of death or myocardial infarction (4.0% vs. 3.4%; p = 0.73). Scoring balloon versus standard therapy showed comparable rates of target lesion revascularization (16.2% vs. 21.8%; p = 0.26). No target lesion thrombosis occurred out to 1 year. CONCLUSIONS In patients presenting with drug-eluting stent restenosis, neointimal modification with scoring balloon improves the antirestenotic efficacy of DCB therapy. (Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Optimizing Treatment of Drug Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis 4 [ISAR-DESIRE 4]; NCT01632371) (C) 2017 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据