4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Viscosity Measurement of Slags using Rotating Bob and Vibrating Finger Viscometer

期刊

ISIJ INTERNATIONAL
卷 57, 期 8, 页码 1319-1326

出版社

IRON STEEL INST JAPAN KEIDANREN KAIKAN
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2016-580

关键词

vibrating finger viscometer; rotating bob viscometer; high temperature viscosity measurement; CaO-Al2O3; CaO-SiO2; CaO-SiO2-Al2O3-MgO blast furnace slag

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) within the Collaborative Research Centre [CRC 799]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Within the present investigation, results of the viscosity measurements using a rotating bob viscometer and a newly-developed vibrating finger viscometer have been presented. The knowledge of the viscosity property of metallurgical slags and fluxes is of major importance considering its tasks of fulfilment in the process of steel manufacturing and casting. Due to the chemical stability of the slag and/or the measurement technology, the measurements were applied in the temperature range from 1300 degrees C to 1 600 degrees C. Nowadays, the rotation bob method with a concentric cylinder and a wide gap is the state of the art of the viscosity measuring devices for slags, e.g. rheometers with air bearing. In the present investigation, the Anton Paar MCR 301 rheometer was used as recently reported in Ref. 1). Furthermore, a new vibrating finger viscometer was developed to provide a wider measurement range in high temperature regions from 1 mPa.s up to 1 Pa.s dynamic viscosity.(2-4)) In the current investigation, the viscosities of CaO-Al2O3, CaO-SiO2, CaO-SiO2-Al2O3-MgO slags and reference glass have been measured up to 1 600 degrees C using the two viscorneter apparatuses. The results have been discussed in the context of the high temperature calibration errors, e.g. deviations in geometry of the crucible, the slag stability, the fluid flow, the atmospheric conditions, as well as for the difference in both measurement principles. Also, in the last section of this manuscript, the achieved results have been compared with the previous literature reports.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据