4.5 Article

Coexistence phase of 1S0 and 3P2 superfluids in neutron stars

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 101, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.055806

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) [S1511006]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [17K05435, 16H03984, 18H01217]
  3. MEXT KAKENHI [15H05855]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In neutron star matter, there exist S-1(0) superfluids in lower density in the crust while P-3(2) superfluids are believed to exist at higher density deep inside the core. In the latter, depending on the temperature and magnetic field, either the uniaxial nematic phase, the D-2-biaxial nematic phase, or the D-4-biaxial nematic (D-4-BN) phase appears. In this paper, we discuss a mixture of the S-1(0) and (3)p(2) superfluids and find their coexistence. Adopting the loop expansion and the weak-coupling approximation for the interaction between two neutrons, we obtain the Ginzburg-Landau (GL) free energy in which both of the S-1(0) and P-3(2) condensates are taken into account by including the coupling terms between them. We analyze the GL free energy and obtain the phase diagram for the temperature and magnetic field. We find that the S-1(0) superfluid excludes the (3)p(2) superfluid completely in the absence of magnetic field, they can coexist for weak magnetic fields, and the( 1)S(0) superfluid is expelled by the P-3(2) superfluid at strong magnetic fields, thereby proving the robustness of( 3)P(2) superfluid against the magnetic field. We further show that the D-4-BN phase covers the whole region of the P- 3(2) superfluidity as a result of the coupling term, in contrast to the case of a pure ( 3)P(2 )superfluid studied before in which the D-4-BN phase is realized only under strong magnetic fields. Thus, the D-4-BN phase is topologically the most interesting phase, e.g., admitting half-quantized non-Abelian vortices relevant not only in magnetars but also in ordinary neutron stars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据