4.4 Article

Evaluation of Infiltration Models and Variability of Soil Infiltration Properties at Multiple Scales

期刊

IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE
卷 66, 期 4, 页码 589-599

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ird.2126

关键词

Kostiakov-Lewis model; normalization factor; multifractal technique; pedotransfer function

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51579205, 51209171]
  2. National Program on Key Research Projects during the 13th Five-Year Plan Period [2016YFC0400203]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2016JM5053]
  4. Scientific Research Program - Shaanxi Provincial Education Department [15JS064]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil infiltration is characterized by scale dependence, so the accuracy and reliability of indirect methods used to estimate soil infiltration properties from available soil physical data are often below expectations. This study aimed to determine the scale-dependent relationship between soil infiltration and soil physical properties and to establish pedotransfer functions (PTFs) for estimating normalization factors (F-C). Field studies were conducted using double-ring infiltrometers in the first (sandy loam) and third (clay loam) terraces in Yangling District. Multiple scale variability and relationships were studied by multifractal and joint multifractal techniques. Results indicated that the Kostiakov-Lewis model best described the relationship between cumulative infiltration and time in the study areas, and that the normalization equation for predicting cumulative infiltration was accurate. Joint multifractal analysis showed that the variability of F-C in the first terrace was related largely to sand content, soil bulk density, and silt content. F-C in the third terrace depended on the contents of sand, silt, initial soil water, and clay at multiple scales. The PTFs that were established based on the results of joint multifractal analysis reliably estimated F-C values. Copyright (c) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据