4.5 Article

TiO2-SiO2 composite nanoparticles containing hindered amine light stabilizers encapsulated by MMA-PMPM copolymers

期刊

IRANIAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 26, 期 10, 页码 785-795

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13726-017-0564-7

关键词

Hindered amine light stabilizers; Titanium dioxide; Composite nanoparticles; Photocatalysis; Miniemulsion polymerization

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [B2017202028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TiO2-SiO2 composite nanoparticles containing hindered amine light stabilizers (HALSs) were prepared by encapsulation of commercially available TiO2-SiO2 nanoparticles using methyl methacrylate (MMA) and 1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidyl methacrylate (PMPM) copolymers through mini-emulsion polymerization. The Fourier transform infrared spectral analysis (FTIR) showed that the hindered amine light stabilizer PMPM was incorporated into the TiO2-SiO2/P(MMA-co-PMPM) composite nanoparticles. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis (XPS) showed that the surface of TiO2-SiO2 nanoparticles was enriched with HALS moieties. The formation of P(MMA-co-PMPM) random copolymers on the surface of TiO2-SiO2 nanoparticles was determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and the percentage of the chemically grafted P(MMA-co-PMPM) coverage on the TiO2-SiO2 nanoparticles surface was 40.9 wt% determined by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), which revealed that the TiO2-SiO2 nanoparticles were successfully encapsulated by MMA-PMPM copolymers. Scanning electron microscopy analysis indicated that the TiO2-SiO2/P(MMA-coPMPM) composite nanoparticles were mainly homogeneous spherical shape particles, with an average size of about 90 nm. Rhodamine B (Rh. B) photocatalytic degradation study revealed UV-shielding characteristics for TiO2-SiO2/P(MMA-co-PMPM) composite nanoparticles and showed a remarkable decrease in photocatalytic activity of TiO2-SiO2 nanoparticles. These results indicated that TiO2-SiO2/P(MMA-co-PMPM) composite nanoparticles may be

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据