4.6 Article

Complex interplay of magnetic interactions in 5f-electron systems: The case of U2Ni2Sn

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 101, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.184433

关键词

-

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [18-02344S]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent experiments on a single crystal of U2Ni2Sn established a strong uniaxial magnetic anisotropy and an unusual magnetic structure that is antiferromagnetic both inside the U layers and between the layers. We apply fully relativistic first-principles calculations to investigate various magnetic configurations of the system. The calculations confirmed both the character of the magnetic anisotropy and the type of the ground-state magnetic structure. The study of the electron density of states shows that the lowest energy of the ground-state structure is related to the doubling of the magnetic unit cell and corresponding reduction of the Brillouin zone, leading to the formation of the energy gaps in the electronic structure. The mapping of the energies of the magnetic structures on the Heisenberg Hamiltonian of interacting atomic moments leads to a surprising result that only one of the interatomic exchange interactions is antiferromagnetic. We explain how this one antiferromagnetic interaction competing with several ferromagnetic interactions leads to the simultaneous presence of two types of antiferromagnetic behavior. We provide a simple mean-field estimate of the Neel temperature and conclude that short-range magnetic order, neglected on the mean-field level, may play an important role at temperatures around the critical temperature. We demonstrate the existence of self-consistent noncollinear magnetic states that limits the accuracy of treating U2Ni2Sn as a pure Ising magnet. We apply GGA + U method to examine the influence of the Hubbard parameter U on the magnetic moments and energies of the magnetic configurations. An estimation of the influence of the contraction of the lattice on the magnetic properties is reported.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据