4.3 Review

miRNA-497 Enhances the Sensitivity of Colorectal Cancer Cells to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapeutic Drug

期刊

CURRENT PROTEIN & PEPTIDE SCIENCE
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 310-315

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/138920371604150429154142

关键词

5-FU; colorectal cancer; drug sensitivity; miRNA-497; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Smurf1

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81302166, 81472838]
  2. Beijing Nova Programs [Z141107001814098, Z121107002512121]
  3. PLA General Hospital Programs [2013FC-CXYY-1005, 12KMM48]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neoadjuvant therapy has significantly improved the outcome of locally advanced resectable T3 rectal cancer patients. Actually, only a portion of patients show sensitivity to the preoperative chemoradiation and benefit markedly from this treatment. However, biomarkers for predicting neoadjuvant therapy sensitivity remain unclear. In this study, through screening of a series of microRNAs dysregulated in colorectal cancer patients, we observed that miRNA-497 expression was down-regulated in tumor tissues of neoadjuvant chemotherapy responders as compared to that in non-responders. MiRNA-497 level was correlated with chemotherapeutic drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) sensitivity in colorectal cancer cells. Functional studies showed that restoration of miRNA-497 expression inhibited cell viability and enhanced 5-FU sensitivity in SW480 cells. By contrast, miRNA inhibitors-mediated silence of miRNA-497 promoted cell growth and reduced the sensitivity of LoVo cells to 5-FU. In addition, miRNA-497 targeted Smurf1 in CRC cells and the Smurf1 expression level was dramatically increased in neoadjuvant therapy-resistant patients compared with treatment-sensitive patients. These results indicate that down-regulation of miRNA-497 in colorectal cancer may contribute to the resistance of CRC cells to 5-FU treatment. Thus, miRNA-497 has the potential to be a novel biomarker for predicting the neoadjuvant chemotherapy sensitivity in CRC patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据