4.6 Article

A vitrified film of an anisometric europium(iii) β-diketonate complex with a low melting point as a reusable luminescent temperature probe with excellent sensitivity in the range of 270-370 K

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 8, 期 18, 页码 6273-6280

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0tc00625d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Act 220 of the Russian Government [14.W03.31.0028]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [19-02-00569, 19-03-00635]
  3. government assignment for FRC Kazan Scientific Center of RAS
  4. Russian Scientific Foundation [18-13-00112]
  5. Russian Science Foundation [18-13-00112] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel temperature probe with -1.0% K-1 mean relative and -5.4 mu s K-1 mean absolute sensitivity of the luminescence decay time in the range of 270-370 K is presented. The probe is a 20 mu m thick vitrified film (sandwiched between two quartz plates) fabricated from an amorphous powder of an anisometric europium(iii) beta-diketonate complex through a melt-processing technique. It is established that the film exhibits bright Eu3+ ion luminescence with the most intense peak at 611 nm caused by efficient ligand-to-metal energy transfer. The observed thermal luminescence sensitivity we associate with a well-known non-radiative relaxation mechanism of the Eu3+ ions through the low-lying ligand-to-metal charge transfer state. The experiments also showed that (i) the luminescence of the film is insensitive to oxygen, (ii) the film is completely resistant to UV-vis light, (iii) there is full reversibility of the temperature dependent luminescence decay time, and (iv) the strong luminescence of the film can be efficiently excited by irradiation in the wavelength range of 280-425 nm (including inexpensive and portable blue-violet light sources). The listed facts allow us to consider the film as a promising probe for reusable luminescent thermometers, suitable for long-term temperature monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据