4.8 Article

Solvent effects leading to a variety of different 2D structures in the self-assembly of a crystalline-coil block copolymer with an amphiphilic corona-forming block

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 11, 期 18, 页码 4631-4643

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0sc01453b

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSERC Canada [RGPIN-2017-03741]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe a polyferrocenyldimethylsilane (PFS) block copolymer (BCP), PFS27-b-P(TDMA(65)-ran-OEGMA(69)) (the subscripts refer to the mean degrees of polymerization), in which the corona-forming block is a random brush copolymer of hydrophobic tetradecyl methacrylate (TDMA) and hydrophilic oligo(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (OEGMA). Thus, the corona is amphiphilic. This BCP generates a remarkable series of different structures when subjected to crystallization-driven self-assembly (CDSA) in solvents of different polarity. Long ribbon-like micelles formed in isopropanol, and their lengths could be controlled using both self-seeding and seeded growth protocols. In hexanol, the BCP formed more complex structures. These objects consisted of oval platelets connected to long fiber-like micelles that were uniform in width but polydisperse in length. In octane, relatively uniform rectangular platelets formed. Finally, a distinct morphology formed in a mixture of octane/hexanol, namely uniform oval structures, whose height corresponded to the fully extended PFS block. Both long and short axes of these ovals increased with the initial annealing temperature and with the BCP concentration. The self-seeding protocol also afforded uniform two-dimensional structures. Seeded growth experiments, in which a solution of the BCP in THF was added to a colloidal solution of the oval micelles led to a linear increase in area while maintaining the aspect ratio of the ovals. These experiments demonstrate the powerful effect of the amphiphilic corona chains on the CDSA of a core crystalline BCP in solvents of different hydrophilicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据