4.6 Article

Impact of molecular structure on singlet and triplet exciton diffusion in phenanthroline derivatives

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 8, 期 18, 页码 6118-6123

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0tc00716a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Solid-State and Materials Chemistry [DMR-1708177]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) Electronics, Photonics and Magnetic Devices [ECCS-1509121]
  3. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship [00039202]
  4. Leverhulme Trust Visiting Professorship at the University of Cambridge
  5. Clare Hall, University of Cambridge

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate the impact of subtle changes in molecular structure on the singlet and triplet exciton diffusion lengths (L-D) for derivatives of the archetypical electron-transport material 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline (BPhen). Specifically, this work offers a systematic characterization of singlet and triplet exciton transport in identically prepared thin films, highlighting the differing dependence on molecular photophysics and intermolecular spacing. For luminescent singlet excitons, photoluminescence quenching measurements yield an L-D from <1 nm for BPhen, increasing to (5.4 +/- 1.2) nm for 2,9-dichloro-4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline (BPhen-Cl-2) and (3.9 +/- 1.1) nm for 2,9-dimethyl-4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline (BCP). The diffusion of dark triplet excitons is probed using a phosphorescent sensitizer-based method where triplets are selectively injected into the material of interest, with those migrating through the material detected via energy transfer to an adjacent, phosphorescent sensitizer. Interestingly, the triplet exciton L-D decreases from (15.4 +/- 0.4) nm for BPhen to (8.0 +/- 0.7) nm for BPhen-Cl-2 and (4.0 +/- 0.5) nm for BCP. The stark difference in behavior observed for singlets and triplets with functionalization is explicitly understood using long-range Forster and short-range Dexter energy transfer mechanisms, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据