4.6 Article

A Link between Ram Pressure Stripping and Active Galactic Nuclei

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 895, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9022

关键词

Active galactic nuclei; AGN host galaxies; Supermassive black holes; Galaxy clusters; Galaxy quenching

资金

  1. NASA Headquarters under the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship [80NSSC17K0459]
  2. National Science Foundation [OISE 1743747, TCAN 1332858, OCI-0725070, ACI1238993, OAC-1613674, ACI-1548562]
  3. Yale Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. state of Illinois

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dense environment of a galaxy cluster can radically transform the content of in-falling galaxies. Recent observations have found a significant population of active galactic nuclei (AGN) within jellyfish galaxies, galaxies with trailing tails of gas and stars that indicate significant ram pressure stripping. The relationship between AGN and ram pressure stripping is not well understood. In this Letter, we investigate the connection between AGN activity and ram pressure in a fully cosmological setting for the first time using the RomulusC simulation, one of the highest resolution simulations of a galaxy cluster to date. For lower mass galaxies (with stellar masses M-* less than or similar to 10(9.5) M) both star formation and black hole accretion are suppressed by ram pressure before they reach pericenter, whereas for more massive galaxies accretion onto the black hole is enhanced during pericentric passage. Our analysis also indicates that as long as the galaxy retains gas, AGN with higher Eddington ratios are more likely to be found in galaxies experiencing higher ram pressure. We conclude that prior to quenching star formation, ram pressure triggers enhanced accretion onto the black hole, which in our model then produces heating and outflows due to AGN feedback. These simulations suggest that AGN feedback may in turn serve to aid in the quenching of star formation in tandem with ram pressure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据