4.4 Review

Associations Between Subjective Tinnitus and Cognitive Performance: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

期刊

TRENDS IN HEARING
卷 24, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2331216520918416

关键词

tinnitus; cognition; cognitive performance; attention; memory; executive function

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/S002898/1]
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [CDF-2018-11-ST2-016]
  3. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre programme
  4. MRC [MR/S002898/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [CDF-2018-11-ST2-016] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tinnitus is the perception of sound in the absence of a corresponding external sound source, and bothersome tinnitus has been linked to poorer cognitive performance. This review comprehensively quantifies the association between tinnitus and different domains of cognitive performance. The review protocol was preregistered and published in a peer-reviewed journal. The review and analyses were reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines. Peer-reviewed literature was searched using electronic databases to find studies featuring participants with tinnitus who had undertaken measures of cognitive performance. Studies were assessed for quality and categorized according to an established cognitive framework. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed on various cognitive domains with potential moderator variables assessed where possible. Thirty-eight records were included in the analysis from a total of 1,863 participants. Analyses showed that tinnitus is associated with poorer executive function, processing speed, general short-term memory, and general learning and retrieval. Narrow cognitive domains of Inhibition and Shifting (within executive function) and learning and retrieval (within general learning and retrieval) were also associated with tinnitus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据