4.8 Article

Penta-fluorophenol: a Smiles rearrangement-inspired cysteine-selective fluorescent probe for imaging of human glioblastoma

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 11, 期 22, 页码 5658-5668

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0sc01085e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea - Ministry of Science ICT [2018M3A9H3021707]
  2. Medical Research Center Program [2017-R1A5A2014768, 2019-M3A9H1103783]
  3. Basic Science Research Program of the NRF of Korea - Ministry of Education [2018R1A6A1A03025124, 2018-R1D1A1B07043383]
  4. NRF of Korea [2017-R1A2B2010948, 2017-R1E1A1A01074529, 2019R1A6A1A11044070]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018M3A9H3021707] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two of the most critical factors for the survival of glioblastoma (GBM) patients are precision diagnosis and the tracking of treatment progress. At the moment, various sophisticated and specific diagnostic procedures are being used, but there are relatively few simple diagnosis methods. This work introduces a sensing probe based on a turn-on type fluorescence response that can measure the cysteine (Cys) level, which is recognized as a new biomarker of GBM, in human-derived cells and within on-site human clinical biopsy samples. The Cys-initiated chemical reactions of the probe cause a significant fluorescence response with high selectivity, high sensitivity, a fast response time, and a two-photon excitable excitation pathway, which allows the imaging of GBM in both mouse models and human tissue samples. The probe can distinguish the GBM cells and disease sites in clinical samples from individual patients. Besides, the probe has no short or long-term toxicity and immune response. The present findings hold promise for application of the probe to a relatively simple and straightforward following of GBM at clinical sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据