4.2 Article

Site Characterization of Soil-rock Mixture Sedimentary Stratum Based on HVSR Analysis in the Chinese Loess Plateau

期刊

出版社

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING GEOPHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.2113/JEEG19-060

关键词

-

资金

  1. Jilin University [10183201836]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC0603204]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41204069]
  4. New Energy Special Project of Jilin Province-University Construction Special Project [SXGJSF2017-5]
  5. Research on Key Techniques of microseismic joint electrical monitoring for improving production of oil and gas in hydraulic fracturing of Jilin Provincial Department of Science and Technology Key Scientific and Technological Project [20160204068GX]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The soil-rock mixture sedimentary stratum is a compound with complex and loose topography, of which the structure is difficult to detect by the ordinary geophysical method. There is a need for a convenient, efficient and effective geophysical method to detect site effects in this area. This paper is an application of the S wave velocity profile inversion for the soil-rock mixture sedimentary stratum, using HVSR (Horizontal to Vertical Spectral Ratio) analysis of ambient noise by some three-component observations in the Chinese Loess Plateau. We carried out the measurement using three nested circular arrays and data recording systems with a spectrum expansion circuit. Inversion of the HVSR curves was performed by a three-layer model. Results of geological observation reveal that the upper part of the sedimentary stratum is Quaternary strata containing a large amount of humus and loess, the middle layer part is the stratum of the loose gravel and the under part is completely weathered granite with homogeneous lithology and fewer rocks. Interpretation results are consistent with previous drilling data, providing a valid geophysical basis for evaluating the stability of the soil erosion and designing a reasonable water and soil erosion control scheme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据