4.4 Article

Arcobacter haliotis sp nov., isolated from abalone species Haliotis gigantea

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002080

关键词

epsilonproteobacterium; Arcobacter; abalone; Haliotis gigantea; gut

资金

  1. Strategic Young Researcher Overseas Visits Program for Accelerating Brain Circulation from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  2. Federal Public Planning Service - Science Policy, Belgium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Gram-negative, aerobic, polar-flagellated and rod-shaped, sometimes slightly curved bacterium, designated MA5(T), was isolated from the gut of an abalone of the species Haliotis gigantea collected in Japan. Phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA, gyrB, hsp60 and rpoB gene sequences placed strain MA5(T) in the genus Arcobacter in an independent phylogenetic line. Comparison of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of this strain with those of the type strains of the established Arcobacter species revealed A. nitrofigilis (95.1 %) as nearest neighbour. Strain MA5(T) grew optimally at 25 degrees C, pH 6.0 to 9.0 and in the presence of 2 to 5% (w/v) NaCl under both aerobic and microaerobic conditions. The predominant fatty acids found were summed feature 3 (iso-C-15:0 2-OH and/or C-16:1 omega 7c), C-12:0 3-OH and C-18:1 omega 7c. Menaquinone-6 (MK-6) and menaquinone-7 (MK-7) were found as the major respiratory quinones. The major polar lipids detected were phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylglycerol. Strain MA5(T) could be differentiated phenotypically from the phylogenetic closest Arcobacter species by its ability to grow on 0.05% safranin and 0.01% 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC), but not on 0.5% NaCl. The obtained DNA G+C content of strain MA5(T) was 27.9 mol%. Based on the phylogenetic, chemotaxonomic and phenotypic distinctiveness of MA5(T), this strain is considered to represent a novel species of the genus Arcobacter, for which the name Arcobacter haliotis sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is MA5(T) (=LMG 28652(T)=JCM 31147(T)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据