4.7 Article

Significant production of ClNO2 and possible source of Cl2 from N2O5 uptake at a suburban site in eastern China

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 20, 期 10, 页码 6147-6158

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-6147-2020

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91544213, D0512/41675145]
  2. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [T24-504/17-N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ClNO2 and Cl-2 can affect atmospheric oxidation and thereby the formation of ozone and secondary aerosols, yet their sources and production mechanisms are not well understood or quantified. In this study we present field observations of ClNO2 and Cl-2 at a suburban site in eastern China during April 2018. Persistent high levels of ClNO2 (maximum: similar to 3.7 ppbv; 1 min average) were frequently observed at night, due to the high ClNO2 yield (phi (ClNO2), 0.56 +/- 0.20) inferred from the measurements. The phi (ClNO2) value showed a positive correlation with the [Cl-]/[H2O] ratio, and its parameterization was improved at low to median yields (0-0.75) by the incorporation of [Cl-]/[H2O] and the suppression effect of aerosol organics. ClNO2 and Cl-2 showed a significant correlation on most nights. We show that the Cl-2 at our site was more likely a co-product with ClNO2 from N2O5 uptake on acidic aerosols that contain chloride than being produced by ClNO2 uptake as previously suggested. We propose a mechanism in which NO2+ can react with Cl- to produce Cl-2 and ClNO2 simultaneously. Under a new framework which regards Cl-2, ClNO2, and nitrate as products of N2O5 uptake, the Cl-2 yield (phi (Cl-2)) was derived using ambient data. phi (Cl-2) exhibited significant correlations with [Cl-] and [H+], based on which a parameterization of phi (Cl-2) was developed. The derived parameterizations of phi (ClNO2) and phi (Cl-2) can be used in models to evaluate the nighttime production of ClNO2 and Cl-2 and their impact on the next day's photochemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据