4.1 Article

Customer-to-customer interaction quality, promotion emotion, prevention emotion and attitudinal loyalty in mass services

期刊

JOURNAL OF SERVICE THEORY AND PRACTICE
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 257-276

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JSTP-08-2019-0172

关键词

Customer-to-customer interaction quality; Friend-interaction quality; Neighbouring customer-interaction quality; Audience-interaction quality; Promotion emotion; Prevention emotion; Attitudinal loyalty

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The current study aims to explore the relationships between three kinds of customer-to-customer (C2C) interaction quality and brand loyalty via customer promotion and prevention emotions. Design/methodology/approach In order to test the model, we gathered self-administered data through an online survey. The relationships were examined using structural equation modelling (SEM). Findings The findings show that the influence of customer-to-customer interaction quality on promotion/prevention emotion varies: friend-interaction quality evokes both promotion emotion (high-arousal feelings) and prevention emotion (low-arousal feelings), whereas neighbouring customer-interaction quality elicits promotion emotion, and audience-interaction quality elicits prevention emotion. Moreover, the findings show that enhancing both promotion and prevention emotions is crucial to improve customer attitudinal loyalty in mass service settings, and the strength of the link from promotion emotion to attitudinal loyalty is stronger than that from prevention emotion. Practical implications The authors suggest that marketers should focus on facilitating effective friend- and neighbouring customer-interaction to enhance promotion emotion. Originality/value The paper contributes to a stream of research on customer-to-customer interaction by exploring the relative influences of three kinds of customer-to-customer interaction quality on customer attitudinal loyalty via post-consumption emotions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据