4.7 Article

Transient pulse test and morphological analysis of single rock fractures

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.11.016

关键词

Single fracture; Permeability; Transient pulse test; Surface morphology; Hydro-mechanical coupling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51274097, 51434006, 51474249]
  2. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department [13A020]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2015JJ2067]
  4. Open Projects of State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, CUMT [13KF03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transient pulse tests were performed on single rock fractures at different confining pressures. A new data analysis method based on polynomial fitting was introduced to investigate the relationship between flow velocity and hydraulic gradient. 3D laser scanning was used to quantify the morphological changes of the fracture surface after the transient pulse test or under the hydro-mechanical coupling effect. The results show that the flow velocity versus hydraulic gradient data gradient shows a nonlinear relationship at very low hydraulic, possibly due to strong solid-water interaction, but becomes approximately linear after the hydraulic gradient is high enough. The permeability of a single fracture is sensitive to the confining pressure. As the confining pressure increases, the permeability first remarkably decreases when the confining pressure is lower than a certain value and then decreases at a much lower speed when the confining pressure is higher than that value. Both mechanical and hydraulic apertures decrease at a decreasing rate with the increase in confining pressure. The effect of fracture roughness on the permeability is related to the magnitude of the confining pressure. Rougher fractures have lower permeability at low confining pressures; but the opposite can be true when the confining pressure is high enough. Roughness is no longer critical to permeability when the confining pressure is over a certain value.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据