4.7 Article

Super-resolution Imaging of the Protoplanetary Disk HD 142527 Using Sparse Modeling

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 895, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab899f

关键词

Protoplanetary disks; Observational astronomy; Interferometry

资金

  1. Public Trust Iwai Hisao Memorial Tokyo Scholarship Fund
  2. ALMA Japan Research Grant of NAOJ ALMA Project [NAOJ-ALMA-229]
  3. John Templeton Foundation
  4. National Science Foundation [AST-1614868]
  5. JSPS KAKENHI [17H01103, 18H05441, 19K03932, 17K14244]
  6. Bilateral Joint Research Projects of JSPS
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K14244] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With an emphasis on improving the fidelity even in super-resolution regimes, new imaging techniques have been intensively developed over the last several years, which may provide substantial improvements to the interferometric observation of protoplanetary disks. In this study, sparse modeling (SpM) is applied for the first time to observational data sets taken by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA). The two data sets used in this study were taken independently using different array configurations at Band 7 (330 GHz), targeting the protoplanetary disk around HD 142527: one in the shorter-baseline array configuration (similar to 430 m), and the other in the longer-baseline array configuration (similar to 1570 m). The image resolutions reconstructed from the two data sets are different by a factor of similar to 3. We confirm that the previously known disk structures appear on the images produced by both SpM and CLEAN at the standard beam size. The image reconstructed from the shorter-baseline data using the SpM matches that obtained with the longer-baseline data using the CLEAN, achieving a super-resolution image from which a structure finer than the beam size can be reproduced. Our results demonstrate that ongoing intensive development in the SpM imaging technique is beneficial to imaging with ALMA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据