4.3 Article

Osteitis condensans ilii may demonstrate bone marrow edema on sacroiliac joint magnetic resonance imaging

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 299-307

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.13125

关键词

bone marrow edema; low back pain; MRI (magnetic resonance imaging); OCI (osteitis condensans ilii); sacroiliac joint

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimTo reveal whether bone marrow edema (BME) may appear with osteitis condensans ilii (OCI) on sacroiliac joint (SIJ) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to evaluate the characteristics of BME demonstrated with OCI. MethodAltogether 27 symptomatic female OCI patients with both complete clinical records and SIJ-MRI examination data were enrolled for retrospective analysis. SIJ-MRI exams were retrospectively analyzed by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Patients were separated into BME group and non-BME group according to whether there was BME of SIJ demonstrated as high signal intensity on MR short tau inversion recovery sequences beneath the SIJ articular surface. For the BME group the characteristics of BME including distribution pattern and location, depth and signal intensity were assessed. ResultsBME could be seen in 48.1% (13/27) OCI patients. Ilium side BME demonstrated with OCI was centered at the ventral-cartilaginous joint part and had a trend of extending to bone marrow beneath the arcuate line in a continuous distribution pattern. There was a trend that OCI patients with BME demonstrated on MRI were younger (P = 0.054, Student's t-test) and with shorter pain duration (P = 0.091, Student's t-test) than OCI patients without BME, but the differences did not reaching statistical significance. More cases endured diagnosis delay in the BME group than the non-BME group (nine cases vs. two cases, P = 0.006, Fisher's exact test). ConclusionSome OCI may demonstrate BME on SIJ-MRI. Careful observation of the location and distribution pattern of BME may give some help in differentiating OCI from early spondyloarthritis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据