4.6 Article

Progressive lossy-to-lossless coding of hyperspectral images through regression wavelet analysis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 39, 期 7, 页码 2001-2021

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2017.1343515

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO)
  2. European Regional Development Fund (FEDER)
  3. European Union (EU) [TIN2015-71126-R]
  4. Catalan Government [2014SGR-691]
  5. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona [UAB-PIF-472/2012, UAB-PIF-472/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Progressive Lossy-to-Lossless (PLL) coding techniques enable a gradual quality improvement of the recovered images, starting from a coarse approximation up to a perfect reconstruction. PLL is becoming a widespread approach in several scenarios, in particular, for compression of hyperspectral images. In this paper we assess the suitability of Regression Wavelet Analysis (RWA) for hyperspectral image progressive lossy-to-lossless coding. RWA is a recent spectral transform that combines a wavelet transform with a regression stage, providing excellent coding performance for lossless compression. When coupled with a pyramidal predictive weighting scheme, RWA also yields very competitive coding results for PLL at a low computational cost. Coding performance is assessed within the framework of Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) 2000 standard, comparing RWA against state-of-the-art spectral transforms, including reversible Karhunen-Loeve Transform (rKLT) and Pairwise Orthogonal Transform (POT). Comparison with respect to Multiband Context-based Adaptive Lossless/Near-Lossless Image Coding (M-CALIC) technique is also provided. Experiments are conducted on uncalibrated and calibrated hyperspectral images from Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS), satellite-borne Hyperion and Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) sensors. Discussion embraces rate-distortion performance, bit-per-pixel-per-component rate distribution and classification outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据