4.5 Article

Induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of different risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1758835920928214

关键词

clinical outcome; concurrent chemotherapy; EBV DNA; induction chemotherapy; nasopharyngeal carcinoma

类别

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC1309003, 2017YFC0908500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81425018, 81672868, 81602371]
  3. Sci-Tech Project Foundation of Guangzhou City [201707020039]
  4. Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program
  5. Special Support Plan of Guangdong Province [2014TX01R145]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2017A030312003, 2018A0303131004]
  7. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province for Distinguished Young Scholar [2018B030306001]
  8. Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou [201806010135]
  9. Sci-Tech Project Foundation of Guangdong Province [2014A020212103]
  10. Health & Medical Collaborative Innovation Project of Guangzhou City [201400000001]
  11. National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period [2014BAI09B10]
  12. PhD Start-up Fund of Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province China [2016A030310221]
  13. cultivation foundation for the junior teachers in Sun Yat-sen University [16ykpy28]
  14. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: This study aimed to investigate the efficiency and toxicities of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by radiotherapy (RT) in different risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: A total of 1814 eligible patients with stage II-IVB disease treated with CCRT or IC plus RT were included. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences were compared using the log-rank test. Results: Nomograms were developed to predict OS, PFS and DMFS (C-index: 0.71, 0.70 and 0.71, respectively). Patients were then divided into three different risk groups based on the scores calculated by the nomogram for OS. In the low and intermediate-risk group, no significant survival differences were observed between patients treated with IC plus RT alone and CCRT (5-year OS, 97.3% versus 95.6%, p = 0.642 and 87.6% versus 89.7%, p = 0.381, respectively; PFS, 95.9% versus 95.6%, p = 0.325 and 87.6% versus 89.0%, p = 0.160, respectively; DMFS, 97.2% versus 94.8%, p = 0.339 and 87.2% versus 89.3%, p = 0.628, respectively). However, in the high-risk group, IC plus RT displayed an unfavorable 5-year OS (71.0% versus 77.2%, p = 0.022) and PFS (69.4.0% versus 75.4%, p = 0.019) compared with CCRT. A significantly higher incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events was documented in patients treated with CCRT than in those treated with IC plus RT in all risk groups (p = 0.040). Conclusion: IC followed by RT represents an alternative treatment strategy to CCRT for patients with low and intermediate-risk NPC, but it is not recommended for patients with high-risk NPC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据