4.7 Article

Segmental Translocation Contributed to the Origin of the Brassica S-locus

期刊

HORTICULTURAL PLANT JOURNAL
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 167-178

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpj.2020.04.005

关键词

Self incompatibility; SRK; SCR; Gene evolution; Brassicaceae

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0100307, 2018YFD1000800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31722048, 31630068]
  3. Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
  4. Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-incompatibility (SI), which has recurred during the evolution of plants, is one of the most important cross-pollination mating systems. Three S-loci have been reported in Brassicaceae, namely, Arabidopsis lyrata (Al), Brassica (Br), and Leauenworthia alabamica (La) S-loci. Here, through multi-genomic comparative analysis of 20 species, we revealed that the most ancient S-locus was formed prior to the divergence of Brassicaceae lineage I and II. It was retained and inherited by Arabidopsis, as the Al S-locus in Brassicaceae lineage I. Furthermore, we found that the Br S-locus, which has been widely used in the breeding of Brassica crops to generate hybrid seeds, was formed through segmental translocation (ST) in the hexaploid ancestor of Brassica in Brassicaceae lineage II. The Br S-locus was evolved through a ST from one of the triplicated ancestral S-locus paralogs in the Brassica hexaploidy ancestor, while the other two S-locus paralogs were lost. Together with the previous discovery that the La S-locus was formed through a secondary origin in Brassicaceae lineage I, we conclude the monophyletic origin of Al and Br S-loci and clarify the evolutionary route of S-loci in the Brassicaceae family. Our findings will contribute to evolutionary studies and breeding applications of the S-locus in Brassicaceae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据