3.9 Article

Water and fertilizers use efficiency in two hydroponic systems for tomato production

期刊

HORTICULTURA BRASILEIRA
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 47-52

出版社

ASSOC BRASILEIRA HORTICULTURA
DOI: 10.1590/S0102-053620200107

关键词

Solanum lycopersicum; efficient water and fertilizers use; open and closed hydroponics systems; recirculation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The amount of water and fertilizers used in the production of vegetables, specifically tomatoes, is high. This study was carried out to determine water and fertilizers use efficiency in closed and open hydroponic systems for tomato production under greenhouse conditions. Two treatments with eight replications were assessed; each replication consisted of 67 pots with two plants each. One treatment was a closed hydroponic system (with nutrient solution recirculation), and the other was an open hydroponic system (with non-recirculating nutrient solution). We quantified the amounts of water and fertilizers applied, as well as the losses (drained nutrient solution), in the two treatments during the entire cycle of tomato. In the nutrient solution (NS) we also measured electric conductivity (EC), pH, volume applied, and volume drained, and total weight of fruits (25 pickings) There were no significant differences between the two treatments on fruit production. Water use efficiency was 59.53 kg/fruit/m(3) for the closed system and 46.03 kg/fruit/m(3) in the open system. In comparison to the open system, the closed system produced 13.50 kg more fruit per cubic meter of water, while 10.31 grams less fertilizers per kilogram of fruit produced were only applied. Water and fertilizers use efficiency were higher in the closed system, by 22.68% and 22.69%, respectively. More efficiency was obtained in the closed system, regarding the open system. We concluded that the closed system is a good alternative to produce tomato and preserve the resources involved in the process (like water and fertilizers), thus reducing pollution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据