4.5 Article

Key challenges for evaluation of the safety of engineered nanomaterials

期刊

NANOIMPACT
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2020.100219

关键词

Engineered nanomaterials; Characterization; Nanotoxicology; Transformations; Standards

资金

  1. IUPAC Division V1 (Chemistry and Environment)
  2. IUPAC Division VII (Chemistry and Human Health)
  3. Red de Nanociencias y Nanotecnologia
  4. Sociedad Mexicana de Materiales A.C.
  5. Consejo de Ciencia y Tecnologia del Estado de Queretaro

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of reliable and practical tools to ensure the safe and sustainable use of nanomaterials has not kept pace with the rapid commercialization of nanotechnology-enabled products. Here we present an overview of some of the current challenges and opportunities for the evaluation of the safety of engineered nanomaterials (ENM), based on input from an IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry) sponsored workshop in Queretaro, Mexico. The workshop covered detection and characterization of ENM, their transformations in consumer products and the environment, current gaps in nanotoxicology methods and challenges for standardization and risk assessment. Key future research priorities include developing methods to detect and characterize ENM in complex matrices and determinations of their transformations in such environments. The extension of methods to more challenging materials such as complex or advanced nanomaterials and carbon-based materials is also needed. Furthermore, an increased availability of validated protocols and reference materials will be necessary to advance both nanosafety studies and material characterization. A focus on accurate dosimetry, appropriate control experiments and more realistic in vitro models will help to address current gaps in nanotoxicology. Finally, there is an urgent need for reliable data and improved data reporting guidelines, supported by computational modeling, in order to allow the development of grouping and read across methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据