4.4 Article

Classification of mild cognitive impairment EEG using combined recurrence and cross recurrence quantification analysis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 86-95

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.07.006

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Mild cognitive impairment; EEG; Recurrence quantification analysis; Cross recurrence quantification analysis

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology (India) [SR/FTP/PS-006/2010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study is aimed at the classification of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) EEG by combining complexity and synchronization features based on quantifiers from the common platform of recurrence based analysis. Recurrence rate (RR) of recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) is used for complexity analysis and RR of cross recurrence quantification analysis (CRQA) is used for synchronization analysis. The investigations are carried out on EEG from two states (i) resting eyes closed (EC) and (ii) short term memory task (STM). The results of our analysis show lower levels of complexity and higher levels of inter and intra hemispheric synchronisation in the MCI EEG compared to that of normal controls (NC) as indicated by the statistically significant higher value of RQA RR and CRQA RR. The results also evidence the effectiveness of memory activation task by bringing out the characteristic features of MCI EEG in task specific regions of temporal, parietal and frontal lobes under the STM condition. A new approach of combining complexity and synchronization features for EEG classification of MCI subjects is proposed, based on the geometrical signal separation in a feature space formed by RQA and CRQA RR values. The results of linear classification analysis of MCI and NC EEG also reveals the effectiveness of task state analysis by the enhanced classification efficiency under the cognitive load of STM condition compared to that of EC condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据