4.6 Article

2020 roadmap on solid-state batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-ENERGY
卷 2, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2515-7655/ab95f4

关键词

solid-state batteries; lithium metal; interfaces

资金

  1. Faraday Institution [FIRG007]
  2. Royal Academy of Engineering
  3. EPSRC [EP/S003053/1, EP/S018603/1, 1939654] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1939654] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Li-ion batteries have revolutionized the portable electronics industry and empowered the electric vehicle (EV) revolution. Unfortunately, traditional Li-ion chemistry is approaching its physicochemical limit. The demand for higher density (longer range), high power (fast charging), and safer EVs has recently created a resurgence of interest in solid state batteries (SSB). Historically, research has focused on improving the ionic conductivity of solid electrolytes, yet ceramic solids now deliver sufficient ionic conductivity. The barriers lie within the interfaces between the electrolyte and the two electrodes, in the mechanical properties throughout the device, and in processing scalability. In 2017 the Faraday Institution, the UK's independent institute for electrochemical energy storage research, launched the SOLBAT (solid-state lithium metal anode battery) project, aimed at understanding the fundamental science underpinning the problems of SSBs, and recognising that the paucity of such understanding is the major barrier to progress. The purpose of this Roadmap is to present an overview of the fundamental challenges impeding the development of SSBs, the advances in science and technology necessary to understand the underlying science, and the multidisciplinary approach being taken by SOLBAT researchers in facing these challenges. It is our hope that this Roadmap will guide academia, industry, and funding agencies towards the further development of these batteries in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据