4.6 Article

A tool for solving stochastic dynamic facility layout problems with stochastic demand using either a Genetic Algorithm or modified Backtracking Search Algorithm

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.019

关键词

Backtracking Search Algorithm; Genetic Algorithm; Dynamic facility layout problem; Stochastic demand

资金

  1. Naresuan University Research Fund [R2559C230]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Facility layout problems (FLP) involve determining the optimal placement of machines within a fixed space. An effective layout minimises costs. The total material travel distance is a key indicator of the efficiency of internal logistics. Changes in demand and product mix may alter the material flow. The dynamic facilities layout problem (DFLP) takes into account changes in demand and allows for the periodic redesign of facilities. Facility redesign may reduce the material flow cost, but there is a trade-off between material flow improvements and reorganisation costs. There is a limited literature on the redesign of facilities with stochastic demand, heterogeneous-sized resources and rectilinear material flow. The Backtracking Search Algorithm (BSA) has been used to successfully solve a range of engineering problems, but it has not previously been used to solve operations management problems or the FLP. This paper outlines novel modified Backtracking Search Algorithms (mBSAs) that solved the stochastic DFLP with heterogeneous sized resources. The combination of material flow and redesign costs were minimised. Three mBSA were benchmarked against the classical BSA and a Genetic Algorithm (GA) using 11 benchmark datasets obtained from the literature. The best mBSA generated better solutions than the GA for large-size problems. The total costs for the layouts generated by the best mBSA were significantly lower than for the conventional BSA. The modifications to the BSA increased the diversity of candidate solutions, which increased the amount of exploration. The computational time required by the three mBSAs was up to 70% less than the GA. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据