4.7 Article

A cohesive damage-plasticity model for DEM and its application for numerical investigation of soft rock fracture properties

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 175-196

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.07.008

关键词

Cohesive model; Discrete element method; Damage mechanics; Plasticity; Soft rocks

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [LP130100884, DP160100775, DP170103793]
  2. Australian Research Council [LP130100884] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The failure of soft rocks is highly concerned in both research and practice due to the vulnerability of materials and its involvement in a wide range of foundation and mine collapses. Different methods have been suggested to study the fracture characteristics of soft rocks. In this study, a discrete-based modelling method is proposed, as an alternative to existing continuum methods, to analyse the fracturing behaviour of soft rocks. A new cohesive model coupling damage mechanics with plasticity theory is formulated to characterise the failure mechanisms of cement bridges between aggregates in the materials. In conjunction with the discrete element method (DEM), the proposed modelling method can produce realistic modelling of soft rock failure, demonstrated through good agreements between experimental and numerical results in both specimen responses and crack patterns. Based on this, further analyses of soft rock failure are carried out, focusing on the influence of specimen geometries on the material fracture toughness measured in a semi-circular bending test. The simulation results agree well with their experimental counterparts while being less scattered than the experimental data. This demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed method in characterising fracture properties of soft rocks and opens more potentials for a better understanding of soft rock failure. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据