4.3 Article

Pituitary-adrenal axis and peripheral cortisol metabolism in obese patients

期刊

ENDOCRINE
卷 69, 期 2, 页码 386-392

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-020-02392-4

关键词

Obesity; Cortisol; Urinary free cortisol; Dexamethasone suppression test; Cortisol to cortisone ratio

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aim A close relationship between adiposity and increased cortisol levels is well established in patients with endogenous hypercortisolism. Nevertheless, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis regulation in overweight subjects is still a matter of concern. We studied free cortisol (urinary free cortisol, UFC and late night salivary cortisol, LNSC), pituitary feedback (serum cortisol after 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test, 1 mg DST) and peripheral cortisol metabolism (urinary cortisol to cortisone ratio, F/E-ratio) in a large series of overweight subjects without Cushing's Syndrome. Materials and methods We considered 234 patients divided in 5 BMI classes, matched for age and gender (BMI <= 25 kg/m(2)n = 38; 25-30n = 58; 30-35n = 52; 35-40n = 52; >40n = 34). UFC, LNSC and urinary F/E(ratio)were assessed with LC-MS. Results We collected 183 LNSC, 176 UFC, 152 1 mg DST and 64 F/E(ratio)tests. UFC levels were higher in lean subjects, and they decreased according to the BMI classes (p = 0.022). Non-suppressed cortisol levels (>50 nmol/L) after 1 mg DST were observed especially in patients with normal weight or mild obesity. Patients with BMI >= 35 kg/m(2)revealed a reduced F/E-ratio(0.39 vs. 0.61,p = 0.006). The specificity of tests (false positive results) was higher considering 1 mg DST or UFC in obese patients, on the contrary impaired cortisol rhythm (LNSC above normality) was observed in 47 subjects, irrespective of weight. Conclusions Overweight and obese subjects are characterised by an original regulation of HPA axis (reduced UFC levels, increased suppression after 1 mg DST) and peripheral cortisol metabolism (reduced F/E-ratio), suggesting an effort to counteract hypercortisolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据