4.7 Article

Tuning complement activation and pathway through controlled molecular architecture of dextran chains in nanoparticle corona

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 532, 期 2, 页码 769-778

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.04.048

关键词

Nanoparticles; Complement activation pathway; Corona; Molecular feature; Molecular architecture

资金

  1. CNPq - PDE (Brazil) [245564/2012-8]
  2. BPI-France, Project NICE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The understanding of complement activation by nanomaterials is a key to a rational design of safe and efficient nanomedicines. This work proposed a systematic study investigating how molecular design of nanoparticle coronas made of dextran impacts on mechanisms that trigger complement activation. The nanoparticles used for this work consisted of dextran-coated poly(isobutylcyanoacrylate) (PIBCA) nanoparticles have already been thoroughly characterized. Their different capacity to trigger complement activation established on the cleavage of the protein C-3 was also already described making these nanoparticles good models to investigate the relation between the molecular feature of their corona and the mechanism by which they triggered complement activation. Results of this new study show that complement activation pathways can be selected by distinct architectures formed by dextran chains composing the nanoparticle corona. Assumptions that explain the relation between complement activation mechanisms triggered by the nanoparticles and the nanoparticle corona molecular feature were proposed. These results are of interest to better understand how the design of dextran-coated nanomaterials will impact interactions with the complement system. It can open perspectives with regard to the selection of a preferential complement activation pathway or prevent the nanoparticles to activate the complement system, based on a rational choice of the corona configuration. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据