4.7 Article

Dissecting the role of the elongation factor-IA isoforms in hepatocellular carcinoma cells by liposome-mediated delivery of siRNAs

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 525, 期 2, 页码 367-376

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.02.031

关键词

siRNA; eEF1A1; eEF1A2; HCC; E2F1; Liposome delivery

资金

  1. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio of Trieste
  2. Fondazione Benefica Kathleen Foreman Casali of Trieste
  3. Beneficentia Stiftung of Vaduz Liechtenstein
  4. F.R.A. of the University of Trieste
  5. Italian Minister of Instruction, University and Research (MIUR) PRIN [20109PLMH2]
  6. 5 per mille 2013 of Lega Italiana per la Lotta contro i Tumori (LILT), Italian Minister of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eukaryotic elongation factor 1A (eEF1A), a protein involved in protein synthesis, has two major isoforms, eEF1A1 and eEF1A2. Despite the evidences of their involvement in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the quantitative contribution of each of the two isoforms to the disease is unknown. We depleted the two isoforms by means of siRNAs and studied the effects in three different HCC cell lines. Particular care was dedicated to select siRNAs able to target each of the two isoform without affecting the other one. This is not a trivial aspect due to the high sequence homology between eEF1A1 and eEF1A2. The selected siRNAs can specifically deplete either eEF1A1 or eEF1A2. This, in turn, results in an impairment of cell vitality, growth and arrest in the G1/G0 phase of the cell cycle. Notably, these effects are quantitatively superior following eEF1A1 than eEF1A2 depletion. Moreover, functional tests revealed that the GI/G0 block induced by eEF1A1 depletion depends on the down-regulation of the transcription factor E2F1, a known player in HCC. In conclusion, our data indicate that the independent targeting of the two eEF1A isoforms is effective in reducing HCC cell growth and that eEF1A1 depletion may result in a more evident effect. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据