4.6 Article

Sentiment Analysis of Danmaku Videos Based on Naive Bayes and Sentiment Dictionary

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 75073-75084

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2986582

关键词

Videos; Sentiment analysis; Dictionaries; Feature extraction; Semantics; Support vector machines; Data mining; Danmaku reviews; sentiment analysis; sentiment dictionary; Naive Bayes

资金

  1. National Statistical Science Research Project of China [2019LY41]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71602143]
  3. Program for Innovative Research Team, University of Tianjin [TD13-5038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Danmaku video provides a platform for users to communicate online while watching videos. Danmaku is a live commenting function where the comments related to the video being screened are created by users and prominently shown in real-time on the video screen. These live comments contain complex and rich sentiments, reflecting users' instant opinions and feelings on video programs. In some sense, danmaku provides emotional timing information about video data, and it also offers an innovative mean to analyze video data. However, existing sentiment classification methods are not suitable for danmaku data analysis. To solve this problem, this paper constructs a danmaku sentiment dictionary and presents a new method using sentiment dictionary and Naive Bayes for the sentiment analysis of danmaku reviews. The method is greatly helpful in supervising the overall emotional orientation of a danmaku video and predicting its popularity. Through the processes of extracting emotional information from a danmaku video, classifying sentiment and visualizing data, the time distribution of the seven sentiment dimensions can be obtained. In addition, a weight calculation can be conducted for classifying the sentiment polarity of danmaku reviews. Experimental results show that the proposed method has a significant effect on sentiment score and polarity detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据