4.6 Article

Field-induced transitions in the Kitaev material α-RuCl3 probed by thermal expansion and magnetostriction

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 101, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.245158

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through SFB 1143 [247310070]
  2. Wurzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence on Complexity and Topology in Quantum Matter - ct.qmat (EXC 2147) [390858490]
  3. Emmy Noether program [JA2306/4-1, 411750675]
  4. FAPESP (Brazil) [2019/02099-0]
  5. Scientific User Facilities Division, Basic Energy Sciences, US DOE
  6. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation's EPiQS Initiative [GBMF9069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-resolution thermal expansion and magnetostriction measurements were performed on single crystals of alpha-RuCl3 in magnetic fields applied parallel to the Ru-Ru bonds. The length changes were measured in the direction perpendicular to the honeycomb planes. Our data show clear thermodynamic characteristics for the field-induced phase transition at the critical field mu H-0(c1) = 7.8(2) T where the antiferromagnetic zigzag order is suppressed. At higher fields, a kink in the magnetostriction coefficient signals an additional transition or crossover around mu H-0(c2) approximate to 11 T. The extracted Gruneisen ratio shows typical hallmarks for quantum criticality near H-c1 but also displays anomalous behavior above H-c1. We compare our experimental data with spin-wave calculations employing a minimal Kitaev-Heisenberg model in the semiclassical limit. Most of the salient features are in agreement with each other, however, the peculiar features in the region above H-c1 cannot be accounted for in our semiclassical modeling and hence suggest a genuine quantum nature. We construct a phase diagram for alpha-RuCl3 in a magnetic field along the Ru-Ru bonds, displaying a zigzag ordered state below H-c1, a quantum paramagnetic regime between H-c1 and H-c2 and a semiclassical partially polarized state above H-c2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据