4.7 Article

Probing the limits of linker substitution in aluminum MOFs through water vapor sorption studies: mixed-MOFs instead of mixed-linker CAU-23 and MIL-160 materials

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 49, 期 22, 页码 7373-7383

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0dt01044h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Federal German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the project Optimat [03SF0492C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a systematic study on the possibility of forming mixed-linker metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) spanning between the aluminum MOFs CAU-23 and MIL-160 with their 2,5-thiophenedicarboxylate (TDC) and 2,5-furandicarboxylate (FDC) linkers, respectively. The planned synthesis of a mixed-linker MOF, combining TDC and FDC in the framework turned out to yield a rather largely intricate mixture of CAU-23 and MIL-160. This is due to the different opening angles of 150 degrees for TDCversus120 degrees for FDC and the concomitantcis-trans versus cis-only OH-bridges in the infinite secondary building unit {Al(mu-OH)(O2C-)} chains. At the same time, the CAU-23 phase is accompanied by the polymorphic MIL-53-TDC phase withtrans-only OH-bridges. The measurement of water vapor sorption isotherms was the method of choice to confirm the formation of mixed MOFs instead of mixed-linker phases. Thereby, the water sorption isotherms indicate the simultaneous formation of both MOF phases, albeit they do not exclude mixed-linker MOFs which may have formed at low levels of substitution. The differentiationviapowder X-ray diffractometry (PXRD), IR-spectroscopy and nitrogen sorption was either not conclusive enough or impossible, due to similarities of the neat MOF phases. The synthesized MOF mixtures within the TDC : FDC ratios of 38 : 62 up to 82 : 18 exhibit two or three uptake steps in the water sorption isotherm, with the first two corresponding to an overlay from the individual water sorption isotherm of CAU-23 and MIL-160 and a third one from the additional MIL-53-TDC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据