4.2 Article

Coexistence of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Ticks Collected from their Hosts in Sardinia: an Update

期刊

ACTA PARASITOLOGICA
卷 65, 期 4, 页码 999-1004

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11686-020-00240-z

关键词

Ticks; Tick-borne diseases; Coinfections

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose In recent decades, the incidence and distribution of tick-borne diseases have increased worldwide, attracting the attention of both clinicians and veterinarians. In Sardinia, notifiable tick-borne diseases are spreading and Mediterranean spotted fever (MSF) rickettsiosis continues to be endemic with an incidence of 10/10,000 inhabitants per year. Furthermore, ticks can transfer more than one pathogen after a single blood meal from a coinfected host or after multiple feeding on different infected hosts. The aim of this study was to update information on ticks and tick-borne diseases, focusing also on the presence of coinfection in Sardinian ticks. Methods The presence of protozoan (TheileriaandBabesiaspecies) and bacterial pathogens (Rickettsiaspp.,Anaplasmaspp.,Ehrlichia canis,Chlamydiaspp.,Bartonellaspp., andCoxiella burnetii) was evaluated in 230 ticks collected from different hosts in Sardinia. Results PCR and sequencing analyses highlighted that the 59% of ticks were infected with at least one pathogen while the 15% resulted in coinfection by double and triple pathogens. Among the double co-infections, those ofE. canis/C. burnetii,Babesiasp. Anglona/Ch. psittaciandBabesiasp. Anglona/C. burnetiirevealed a statistically significant index of coinfection. Conclusion This study identifies new pathogens in Sardinian ticks and updates the information about tick-borne diseases in the island. We also provide new results on the presence of coinfections in collected ticks. The knowledge about the diversity of ticks and tick-borne diseases circulating in Sardinia is a necessary step toward implementing effective tick-borne disease prevention and control programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据