4.6 Article

Topic-Enhanced Capsule Network for Multi-Label Emotion Classification

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASLP.2020.3001390

关键词

Task analysis; Predictive models; Speech processing; Routing; Feature extraction; Motion pictures; Decoding; Information extraction; emotion detection; neural networks; topic model; sentiment analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61702121, 61772378]
  2. National Philosophy Social Science Major Bidding Project [11zd189]
  3. Research Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [18JZD015]
  4. Key Project of State Language Commission of China [ZDI135-112]
  5. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of China [2020A151501705]
  6. Bidding Project of GDUFS Laboratory of Language Engineering and Computing [LEC2018ZBKT004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identifying multiple emotions in a piece of text is an important research topic in the NLP community.Existing methods usually model the task as a multi-label classification problem, while these work has two issues. First, these methods fail to leverage the topic information of the text, which has been shown to be effective for sentiment analysis task. Second, different parts of the text can contribute differently to predicting different emotion labels, so the proposed model needs to capture effective features for each corresponding emotion, which is not considered by existing models. To tackle these problems, we propose a topic-enhanced capsule network, which contains two main parts: a variational autoencoder and a capsule module, for multi-label emotion detection task. Specifically, the variational autoencoder can learn the latent topic information of the text, and the capsule module can capture rich features for corresponding emotion. Experimental results on two benchmark datasets show that the proposed model achieves the current best performance, outperforming previous methods and strong baselines by a large margin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据